OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635 |
OK just curious of the differences between these two in my room. My room is really only going to be say 15' x 21' x 8'. Other than playing loud what great advantage would I have spending more. I know the M80 go 9hz lower but on the specs. they both play 40hz at the same spl. I prefer no sub for music, and in movies well that becomes a non issue below 80hz where my subs would take care of that. s my biggest concern is my M80 v3 I wish has just a bit more umph thumppppp . Without going to the M100 where I am told to go. ( my room is never going to be big enough to put speakers 3 ft out from the wall.
Currently I was thinking of M80v4 HP and a VP180v4. I listen to music in 2.0 so the HP180 is pointless, because the sub will be active . BUt, I am thinking I don't listen to the speakers really loud so, why do I need M80 HP ?
Anthem MRX520 M5HPv4 VP160HPv4 QS10v4
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635 |
I guess if I really need the extra umpph then just get use to subs and get the M60's.
They other thing is if using a sub, what would the sound benefit be in even upgrading from my M80V3 if the only upgrade is a tweeter with bigger heat sinks, well I don't run them loud enough to even need this heatsink
Anthem MRX520 M5HPv4 VP160HPv4 QS10v4
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656 Likes: 3
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656 Likes: 3 |
I think you've answered your own question sort of. The diff. would be minimal especially if you don't go to loud. Plus the M80 has quite decent low frequencies already. Of course the H.P. version goes deeper, but you'd probably still want the subs to go lower any ways. Cheers.
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116 |
You might want to find out what it takes to drive the HP. As I understand it, the HP has more windings which means more inductance and hence more reactive power will be required to drive it.
House of the Rising Sone Out in the mid or far field Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635 |
resetting password again hate this every friggin day I have to reset my password. Anyways I am sure my Anthem MCA50 will run these very effeicient. It is stable to 2ohm and 385 w per channel into 4 ohm.
Anthem MRX520 M5HPv4 VP160HPv4 QS10v4
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767 |
Interesting. My PW has worked flawlessly for over 4 years...
TAM
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635 |
Its wierd I been changing this constantly for the past three years. Just randomly changes, I even created a new account troyd before I had axiom_man and gave up on it figured that was a bad account.
Anthem MRX520 M5HPv4 VP160HPv4 QS10v4
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Mine hasn't changed since 2004. It has to be something on your end.
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: OK One more. M60HP vs M80HP
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 635 |
Just wondering if the M60v4 HP will go lower than the M80v3 ?
Anthem MRX520 M5HPv4 VP160HPv4 QS10v4
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,228
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|