The interference at the sides didn't seem too bad, much less than when the M2s were on the top.

We should probably ping Axiom and ask about the possibility of getting the extra shielding on M2/M3 magnets. That will get us into the whole :

"you should buy VPxxx, that's what they're for" /
"but they don't have a port so I have to cross over higher" /
"nothing wrong with crossing over higher, we designed them that way" /
"but I don't wanna cross over higher" /
"sigh, introduce the VP150P with a couple of vortex ports even though it really isn't gonna make any difference"

...argument.

The only real issue here, I think, is :

- some people seem to be able to localize the sub if you cross over at 100hz

- crossing over at 80hz probably fixes the problem

- if you cross over a VPxxx at 80 hz (especially a VP100) there is a concern that there will be a dip in frequency response between the bottom of VPxxx response and the sub kicking in at 80 hz(no idea if this is true)

This would be a good time for Alan to step in and give us a collective whack on the side of the head


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8