|
Re: Unmatched Service for a Small Purchase
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951 |
Hey, pmbuko. Have you heard of any drawbacks to having two vertical centers? How about two vertical VP150s?
|
|
|
Re: Unmatched Service for a Small Purchase
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Getting us mixed up again, huh? I'm the one with the long hair, he's the tall one...
Anyway, I haven't heard any drawbacks to it. I raised the question about a year ago, and Alan said it would be fine, impedance-wise. I dunno about the 150s, as they're set up for a different dispersal pattern (according to what I've read). But that would look really sweet.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Unmatched Service for a Small Purchase
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951 |
Sorry about that mix up, it was past my bedtime.
I was thinking that dual vertical VP150s would look awesome and perhaps tie the dialogue to the screen better. In terms of timbre matching (w/ my m60s) another pair of m60s wedged against the tv would be good - and the m60s were designed to be placed vertically - and their 8ohm impedence (4ohms when wired together right?) would present less problems for the receiver. The difference in price between the two is only $50.
However, I'm guessing nobody has tried using an m60 as a vertical center. Would be an expensive experiment.
|
|
|
Re: Unmatched Service for a Small Purchase
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54
buff
|
buff
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54 |
Hi kcarlile,
I have it on the left of my 25''tv. But then my sister who knows very little of HT did complain about how it looked - so I can't say about how unobtrusive it is. Still, I'm very happy with the sound.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
705
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|