Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
M80's for HEIGHT speakers?!?!
Dude.
Need pictures.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281 |
I'm using my M80s for height speakers, now that I have the LFRs. I think it sounds amazing watching BD movies and my room is only 14'wide, 20'long and 8'high. right on, too much is never enough
DOG is GOD spelled backwards. What others think of me is none of my business. M80 V3 MY GLOSS Cherry
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
I'm using my M80s for height speakers So, there is something i can use my M60's for.... Thanks, Shawn.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37 |
Oh Mr. Brown, you're a brave man!
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Coal, the objective isn't to "fill" a space, it's simply to have an adequate volume level at your listening position, so distance is a more significant factor than room size. The 10' distance you mention is pretty typical for home setups(including my M22s). At that distance the drivers blend smoothly and your 1712(very good buy, incidentally)will have the power to supply more than a safe(to your hearing)listening level. So no, they can't be "a bit much" and you're the one in control of the listening level.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23 |
M22s ordered! Thanks all.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23 |
So sitting next to me are two M22s and two M0s...very hard not to take the rest of the day off to set this stuff up.
Question for all the helpful people on this forum: I plan to run a blue ray player, a cable box, and Apple TV into a receiver with HDMI cables, then run the speakers and one HDMI cable out to the TV from the receiver. Without getting too complicated, does this sound sensible?
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
That sounds completely sensible. It's what I do, pretty much. As long as you always watch TV with the receiver on.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Absolutely.
It does mean that you'll have to have your receiver on all of the time, though.
I run a second connection from my TiVo to the TV for those times I'm watching late at night and either don't need to have the receiver on, or wish the TV to turn itself off via it's sleep timer (and I don't want the receiver to remain on all night).
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Receiver question
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23 |
Great, thanks. Now to decide on the first CD and movie to test with!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,228
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|