M3s have the response curve that "many people think sounds the best" and often sound better with so-so recordings. M2s and M22s are dead-nuts-accurate and sound better with the best recordings.

The difference is only a couple of dB around 3-5 KHz, mostly related to the bigger woofer's poorer off-axis response at higher frequencies (yes the woofer still outputs above the crossover frequency, just less and less as the frequency goes up). A lot of decent speakers in the same price range have a greater difference, generally in the M3 direction but more so.

If you play crappy recordings on M2/M22/M60/M80 they sound "bright". If you find speakers that sound OK with those recordings and then play really good recordings against the M2/M22 etc.. the other speakers will sound "dull". M3/M40/M50 are a nice compromise -- they take the edge off so-so recordings but still sound great on the good recordings.

Bottom line -- the M3 is probably the most celebrated speaker in the Axiom lineup, and is one of the best all-round speakers I have heard. Having said that, these days most people seem to buy M2/M22/M60/M80 and toss their crappy recordings or just listen to them less.

If you really cared you could take the 3-5 Khz range down a couple of dB with an EQ and make your M2s sound like M3s (or bump M3s to make them sound like M2s). M3s and M22s will both play a couple of dB louder than M2s and still sound good. If you like to crank the sound and don't have a small room then you should go with M3 or M22 just for that reason.

Last edited by bridgman; 07/14/07 02:58 AM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8