Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 71
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 71 |
That is very enlightening and informative John.
"Larry, a few more comments would be that rather than being a weak link, your Onkyo receiver is the strongest link next to your M22s. There's no magic in a "dedicated" two-channel unit and two channels of a a multi-channel receiver are just as audibly clean. Furthermore, there's no good reason to be "wasting" the extra amp channels; as was said, assuming that the speakers are available, two-channel music material can be played with a little more realism when the ambience naturally present(to varying degrees)in two-channel material is extracted from the front channels by processing such as DPLII and sent to the surrounds where it belongs."
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
LHawes
|
04/10/06 12:48 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
HomeDad
|
04/10/06 01:59 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
spiffnme
|
04/10/06 02:16 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
sonicfox
|
04/10/06 02:17 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
real80sman
|
04/10/06 03:39 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
JohnK
|
04/10/06 04:57 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
LHawes
|
04/10/06 03:33 PM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
tomtuttle
|
04/10/06 10:08 PM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
LHawes
|
04/11/06 03:14 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
JohnK
|
04/11/06 02:50 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
michael_d
|
04/11/06 02:58 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
LHawes
|
04/11/06 03:11 AM
|
Re: M22's Sub, Receiver, Future Proof? (Long)
|
LHawes
|
04/11/06 03:10 AM
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
695
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|