Hi! Willso and Alan;
We have carpeted floors, so that's one more solid vote for
M60! Thank you for your input; makes sense.
No changes in three years? Not even a little x-over change?
Oh darn, I was hoping that all that double-blind testing
caused at least a little change reciently to get rid of some
of the (few) complaints I'd read about in these posts. Oh
well, I guess you can't argue with perfection.
Good description of a near-religious event though, I can
easily visualize the Rev. Mr. Lofft making an epic
proclomation to the assembled flocks. How could I argue
against such furvor?
Your comment about the First Reflections a few days ago did
a lot to push me toward the M60 and away from the M50. I
have a listening room that needs all the help it can get.
I still have a "warm" spot fot the M50 design, but the M60
may be the better bet.(a ten to one ratio of M60 to M50 is
also hard to ignore) ALL those M60 owners can't be wrong.
It does seem a bit strange to realize that the "What If"
syndrome will apply to the less expensive less complex
design. I do like my M3s however, and hope that the M60s
don't sound TOO different. The word on the street is that
they actually sound quite similar, that'd be good.
Well, that's two more votes for the M60 with no decenting
comments so far. And I guess these aging ears could stand
some additional "crispness and clarity" too. So...
Thank you for the additional inputs, much appreciated.
Rich.
