Axiom Home Page Forums General Discussion Technical Questions From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808. fredk #255625 04/05/09 08:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13 Iowa SirQuack shareholder in the making
SirQuack shareholder in the making Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13 Iowa	Features MultEQ XT versus MultEQ in AVR's Filter resolution (satellites) 16x (2x for MultEQ) Filter resolution (subwoofer) 128x Number of Measurement Positions 8 (6 for MultEQ) Adaptive Low Frequency Correction Yes Crossover, Polarity, Delays, Levels Yes M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 12:08 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	SirQuack	04/03/09 02:27 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	lhulls	04/03/09 03:03 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/03/09 05:46 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 07:26 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/03/09 07:31 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	SirQuack	04/03/09 07:32 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 08:16 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 08:19 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	MarkSJohnson	04/03/09 08:34 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Ken.C	04/03/09 08:47 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	MarkSJohnson	04/03/09 08:52 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 10:51 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 11:11 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/03/09 08:53 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/03/09 09:31 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	SirQuack	04/03/09 09:39 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/03/09 11:08 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	doormat	04/04/09 12:27 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/04/09 01:29 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	doormat	04/04/09 03:45 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/04/09 04:12 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	jakewash	04/04/09 08:55 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/04/09 01:19 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/04/09 01:33 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/04/09 04:05 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	JohnK	04/04/09 02:26 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/04/09 07:52 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	fredk	04/04/09 08:22 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/04/09 11:06 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	michael_d	04/05/09 01:40 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 38	chesseroo	04/05/09 08:26 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/05/09 01:37 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	fredk	04/05/09 03:17 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	fredk	04/05/09 03:36 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	SirQuack	04/05/09 08:08 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	JohnK	04/05/09 02:23 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	fredk	04/05/09 03:15 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/05/09 09:35 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	MarkSJohnson	04/05/09 09:43 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/05/09 10:02 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	MarkSJohnson	04/05/09 10:18 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Adrian	04/05/09 10:41 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/05/09 11:58 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	lhulls	04/06/09 01:48 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/06/09 02:36 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	lhulls	04/06/09 03:32 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	davekro	04/06/09 02:03 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/07/09 12:02 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	lhulls	04/07/09 07:34 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	lhulls	04/07/09 08:30 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	Zimm	04/07/09 09:00 PM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	JohnK	04/03/09 03:02 AM
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.	alan	04/03/09 05:23 PM

Moderated by alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc

Link Copied to Clipboard

Forum Statistics

Forums16

Topics24,947

Posts442,495

Members15,617

Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020

Designed without compromise.

WIRELESS SYSTEMS

SPEAKERS

HOME THEATER

AMPLIFIERS

Axiom Home Page Forums General Discussion Technical Questions From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.

Get The Axiom Newsletter

Designed without compromise.

WIRELESS SYSTEMS

SPEAKERS

HOME THEATER

AMPLIFIERS