Just so you know, 120 is evenly divisible by 24.
Correct, of course. I believe the article I read must have come from one of our local papers, I can't find it on the 'net. It basically stated that 240hz worked best with modern filming frame rates (not just because 240>120>60). There's many articles however that claim no noticeable difference between 120hz and 240 hz refresh ratios although I definitely noticed the difference between 60 and 120. You're right though, I don't remember exactly how they stated it in the article I read, but they implied the processor would fill in the "missing" info on 60 and 120 hz models but wouldn't need to on the 240hz. I'm sure once a few more 240 hz models come out we should here something on this.
