I would agree with you there. Something that is supposed to take millenia to happen and you can't see it in 60 years is somewhat stupid. I haven't read the article yet either. Thanks.

I didn't get that from reading the article. He says "Obviously, no one has ever observed anything remotely like this transformation.", which would be a true statement. But he didn't use that statement to prove anything. It was just an observance.

Last edited by CatBrat; 04/26/11 05:29 PM.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?...amp;usp=sharing