Originally Posted by Hambrabi
I'm not sure I trust Paradigm anymore, expressed by myself and by others:

https://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthreads.php/topics/445769/paradigm-doesnt-do-nrc-
anymore#Post445769

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/what’s-the-deal-with-paradigm-speakers.8927/

But I will relate my experience when I took a pair of Polk Audio LS90's home for a 10 day trial. They sounded great in the showroom with my own music, so I bought them. But when I A/B'd them against my existing Paradigm Phantom's, there was no question which of the two was the more neutral loudspeaker. The LS90 had too much bass, a muddled midrange, and strident treble in comparison. I didn't want to keep them knowing that I had something better.
Just saw this note on Paradigm.
My thoughts exactly, or similar.

Quote
The Phantoms are long gone, replaced by even more neutral loudspeakers from Nuance, Angstrom, Axiom, and Kanto. I don't think you'll get a good decision unless you can trial them in your own home, with your own music, and being able to A/B them almost simultaneously.

The one question that I'm still waiting for is how the Revel's compare with your M80v3. Is it a small or noticeable difference? I've had instances where what I had was better than it's replacement.
Angstrom?
They still making anything of worth?
They are NOT well known.
I have two in my office; Angstrom Legattos.
Of any bookshelf pair i've had, still the most incredibly detailed sound. I'm itching to consider a pair of Kef R3s though (3 way pair).


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."