Quote:

I think if we went the route of not hooking it up to a computer a separate model of the amp would be required. Beyond getting rid of the x-over in there we would need RCA inputs, binding post outputs, and the gain structure would probably have to change too. Since the idea would be good power and low price getting rid of those x-overs would be imperative.



I think the binding posts and RCA jacks are a good idea for the 2.1 amp, regardless. A trim pot (or volume control) and crossover bypass switch would eliminate having to produce two different versions of the amp. I think this would appeal to a broader range of customers. (For 2nd zone, and stand alone iPod use) That's the one I would buy to drive my existing M3's. But I can see how this could be off-putting to someone who just wants a dedicated, plug-and-play computer speaker system.

Shawn

Epic 80/600 + M3's + M3 Algonquins + M2 Computer + EP125
I think I'm developing an addiction.