Many people deserve the products owed to them and no one in the AV customer community wins by reducing competition.
I don't see this at all. Actually the complete opposite. Business's that defraud consumers, have consistent quality isssues and deliver late to their customers simply don't deserve to be in business. Its actually a disservice to consumers to promote or support them.
While the market structure probably could be best described as monopolistic, aggressive pricing might attract
some consumers away from the competition, however it should have little overall effect on the competitive behaviour of other fims and market demand because their market power is low relative to the entire industry.
My view is they should fail, which could allow the possibility of other companies (that are reputable) to enter the market.
