Yes Greg, I assumed you were saying it takes expensive subs to follow the methods I use, ...
No, that's not what I was saying. I was saying that the example you give purporting to show that other methods work better than Geddes' doesn't show that, because your subs are expensive, and Geddes method applies only to inexpensive subs. The response curve you give for your three subs, though interesting in itself, doesn't show anything one way or another about Geddes' theories. Maybe, as you suggest, Geddes is all wet, and Toole's and others' theories work better, but the specific evidence you gave doesn't show that. That's all I was saying.
