To many people, Axioms are NOT
bright. Since there are conflicting
opinions, and since this
alleged brightness has not been quantitatively demonstrated by scientific proof, this
brightness can only be considered as
alleged, i.e. "so declared, but without proof."
I have, in fact, seen graphs posted on this forum, which show a remarkably flat response, which can be taken as quantitative evidence that Axioms are not
bright. Perhaps this
brightness is in the ears of the beholders, thus enabling us to
allege that their ears are
bright, and not the speakers.
