Originally Posted By: AdamP88
Gee, thanks for the rolly eyes, chess. Not quite sure if it's condescension I'm detecting or just skepticism, but then I guess I'm not a qualified, accredited and extremely knowledgeable interpreter of the tone of internet posts. \:\/

Yes, sorry about that, more skepticism than anything. Not condescension. I should have changed the rolly eyes to a 'raised brow' instead.
;\)
Your post just read a bit like an ad for the unit.
I don't disagree with the potential science for the conclusions but i still think tasting two identical bottles blind would be the ultimate indication of truth short of a complete chemical analysis which would be virtually impossible given all the components in wine.

This would be a fun thing to try for the wine club.

"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."