So, let me see if I understand what you're saying -

1. there was a "so called CIA report"
2. the report found that "Iraqis were working on WMD"
3. No body knows where the CIA report came from
4. Everyone knows the report's conclusion is "not true"
5. Someone in the administration is lying
6. You believe that someone is in the oval office.

You think everyone agrees that Iraq was not working on WMD? I don't believe that. I don't think the survivors of the Iraqi poison gas (WMD) attacks on the Kurds believe it. I don't think the thousands of Iranian military veterans burned by poison gas believe it.

We have not found substantial stashes of WMD in Iraq. This is bad. It means either that Iraq destroyed its WMD which we all know they had (because they used them littleb) or that they are still stashed in Iraq, or that they were moved to another country, probably Syria.

Don't you agree, littleb, that if Saddam Hussein had permitted the UN inspectors unrestricted access to Iraqi sites (access to which they were entitled by the terms of the armistice of Gulf War I) there would not have been a war?

Why do you think Bush is lying about WMD when the intelligence services of the US, France, Russia, UK, and others all believed that Saddam Hussein had WMD and was developing worse?

Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.