Once again, I read your reply to one of my posts and find that you have dismissed everything out of hand simply because the author has a viewpoint that does not agree with yours. You can't dismiss an entire article as worthless simply because you find a single point in error.

The war in Iraq was unconstitutional in his opinion. The rest of the article is also his opinion. His opinion on how this administration is handling Iraq happens to be informed by his current responsibilities there. As he said in his article, he is "in Civil Affairs and as such, it is [his] job to be aware of all the events occurring in this country and specifically in [his] region."

Do you really disagree with everything he says? Can you give me a point my point breakdown what else you think warrants calling this man a nitwit? Do you think we are NOT fighting a guerilla war in Iraq?